Very confusing and antiquated website. Despite being on a 'Print' package I was told I was only on a digital version. For a magazine that prides itself on new, innovative and cutting edge ideas, this is comical. I might have a look at the American Scientist for a better system.Updated : It's interesting to see that the 5 star review got a reply from 'New Scientist'. The only way the subscription service can improve is to look at the 1 star reviews, otherwise you will remain very poor. An excellent source of scientific information, marred by an inadequate subscriptions service.
