Review of g2
Review of chess
Review of intuit
I used an online accounting application for trial purposes and forgot to cancel my subscription. Three months later, I saw that money was withdrawn from my account. When I requested a refund, they refused. The amount I was asking to be refunded was a small amount, an insignificant number. However, we are dealing with a company that is so desperate, they wouldn't refund even this trivial amount. I've had the same problem with other companies before, and the refund was given. This is the first time I've encountered a company so desperate. Good thing I didn't use their applications. What can I say, I hope you pay that money to lawyers during bankruptcy
Review of nest
Review of gov
Review of kickstarter
Review of elcorteingles
Review of creativemarket
Review of CNN
Review of chegg
I use Chegg mostly for physics, it seems a lot of their physics experts don’t know physics. The number of wrong answers from so called experts is very high. Or their penmanship is very poor and you can’t make out the formulas and answers.
Review of x
X.com is not a platform for free speech. It's just another platform for government propaganda and corporate rhetoric that will ban you when the blue haired fruits get their feelings hurt.Once the blue haired weirdos working for X perma ban you, your appeal gets an auto rejection. You can appeal it and in less than 1 minute you'll get an automated response saying it was reviewed and the violation is upheld. I was never banned under Jack Dorsey. Now banned under Musk's so-called free speech platform.
Review of wsj
Review of wsj
The Wall Street Journal deliberately makes it extremely difficult to cancel their service. You cannot do so from your account. California, Vermont, and New York State seem to be exceptions. It is literally easier to change your address to one of those states to cancel. They will not accept written notice so you have to call in. But often the numbers do not work and when they do work they try to keep you on the line as long as possible to badger you into changing your mind.Really very distasteful to deal with. Will never subscribe again.
Review of wish
Review of techopedia
Overall, Techopedia is a solid website for tech news and information. However, I sometimes feel like the articles are aimed more at beginners. For someone with a more technical background, it doesn’t always go deep enough into the subject matter.
Review of icons8
Review of jotform
Review of economist
This review was edited because of later developments - please read to the bottom. It got even worse.Original: Horrendous/ridiculous cancellation process. Just like most other reviewers, I am appalled at the cancellation process that I had to endure. To be honest, this was so dishonest and unhelpful that I wonder if it is even legal. I asked three times to cancel and three times they came back with some offer that I do not want or need. Up until the point, that I asked point blank if they were refusing to honour my request and then they finally complied (Edit - they didn't, please see below). I have taken screenshots and was ready to lodge a complaint with my credit card company for predatory credit card (renewal) practices. To be honest what they do is so bad that credit card companies should start banning The Economist. The fact that the company acts like this really puts into question their corporate values because this is very deliberate and shows complete disrespect for its customers.Edit - When I checked my subscription page some days later, it became clear that the first "support person" had not cancelled the subscription, but merely cancelled the autorenewal. (remember, I have screenshots to prove that that was not my request) I guess that trick allowed him/her/the AI in the contact center to manipulate his statistics and trick the Economist into believing that he managed to salvage the subscription. As a consequence, I had to contact the Economist again to ask them to cancel that subscription - again - and go through the same messaging hell. Since a week had passed, they only refunded me partially "for the remaining portion of the sub". This is so dishonest. It was clearly not a misunderstanding and a deliberate action by the contact center operator.I am making this edit for two reasons: One, to warn people about the degree of dishonesty that is at play. In a despicable way, this is very smart. People think the matter is resolved and will only realise some time later that it actually wasn't. In that period, The Economist lets the subscription run and you pay...The second reason for this is edited review is more important: If this is more than a "honest mistake" and there is a pattern of systematic customer abuse, then I want my case to be in the public domain. Please feel free to contact me. I will gladly provide the screenshots to help to prove that this was not a "honest mistake", but in fact a pattern... Given that there is a clear economic motive, I doubt that this was a "honest mistake". Last point - please make screenshots of your interactions with The Economist. They do not deserve your trust
Review of domain
Review of cengage
