Review of claude
Review of co
Well done BBC again!Your consistency astounds me. The coverage of the World Athletics Championships (WAC) is appalling. If the tv audience wanted to see AND HEAR the boring, repetitive and frankly, inane waffle of the 'studio' presenters, then they are in luck. While these, so called 'experts' are cackling on, there are continuous field events being ignored. WAC DOES include ALL the events and not just those on the track. What with the repeats of every race, from every angle and every speed, and the fashion show of presenters, most of the broadcast time is taken up.So, BBC; JUST SHOW ALL THE EVENTS and forget about the 'studio' chatter. Leave it to the likes of Steve Cram who is direct and informative and can do it all 'off camera'.
Review of co
I cannot praise highly enough the Olympic games coverage provided by the BBC Radio 5Live commentary teams.The correspondents, their French counterparts, the ex-Olympians and studio co-ordinators were superb throughout, giving us all the events as they happened with knowledge, informed opinion, history, enthusiasm and humour, with some good-natured banter and joshing thrown in - simply excellent. I’ve always preferred radio to TV for live events - the visual image descriptions from radio voices far outweigh the TV pics which demand all your attention, though they do have their moments. But radio can zip between different sports and venues in the blink of an eye unlike TV which had some restrictions. Congrats to all the folks who put this radio-wave marathon (intended) together. You did us proud, as did the Olympians themselves. Well worth the licence-fee, thank you!
Review of intuit
Review of gov
For some reason TP won't use the direct link to add so we've got all sorts different complaints to just 1 address which isn't what I typedDon't know how to review this was given…Bad.. I thought this would go well. Shelter arranged for them to call me on Friday saying it be between 7-8pm got the call around last minute. Wasnt the friendliest of callers. And she was in a rush because they close at 8pm. She did try answer a few questions & said which 2 solicitors my case would be handed too. She then said she would ring me back the nxt day as they were closed now & what time did I want her phone so I said morning 9. Nxt day a totally different woman rung. And it was so confusing I was also not feeling well from some new medication I'd started the day before I was panicky & dizzy. So was a nightmare. The woman started saying a whole new load of different solicitors to me at which point I said the girl before had said they would have my case handled by the 2 names she then said about putting ne through so I said OK then there was silence & the call just cut off & hung up on me!!! I can't ring her back to say whats happened as they are private number. Spent the rest of day feel to shaky from meds which I'm not going to continue eventually later on I tried sending emails and leaving messages to the first 2 names given. My court injunction is on Thursday & I have agrophobia ptsd & so far been given no legal help. Feels like im being set upCivil Law Agency this is for
Review of co
Currys . I would give zero starsIf possible . I was sold a used Samsung tablet !! No apology , had to travel back to store . I needed to contact customer service - no email address apart from their business one on google , sent it there for a reply to say they only deal with business issues however “one complaint is one too many” lol! . I have phoned Currys to request customer services email address , they said they don’t have one ! I can either write a letter and post it or I can escalate a call back !? I have requested a call back , first date available is a week later which gives me an indication of their volume of complaints . I cannot believe in this day and age they are asking you to write a letter !! Staff on phone are rude and could not care less. I am so frustrated and will NEVER buy from Currys ever again . Shocking all round !
Review of chegg
At my lower class levels such as calculus, chegg worked fine. But over the last few semesters I've had a huge problem with your "experts" not reading the question correctly, copy and pasting the same answers as other "experts" (even if the other answer is wrong), or submitting answers that were for different questions entirely. This happens more often than not where I have to repost the same question 2-3 times to get an answer that's coherent, followed the instructions, and used their own answer and it's extremely frustrating and makes it hard to see the point of even using this service anymore.
Review of BBC
since i found some good quality independent media news sources......every time i see a clip of bbc news it makes me feel sick - the poor quality, the bias towards conservatives. especially laura kuernsberg biased weak interviewer when torys are on. like emily matlis said.....picking two critics of brexit with only two phone calls (from thousands of options) and then phoning around for 3 weeks to try search out one pro brexit critic.....and then featuring them on a panel on the same show does not represent reality it bends reality. bbc news output exploits the gen pops ignorance......anyone who is able to do critical thinking will not be watching bbc news its so bad. to improve they need to remove the tory presence throughout the bbc organization. even question time audience is made to be full of torys. the bbc news wont change tho cus the tories require a dumbed down general public so that they can rule them, easier with exploitation of ignorance
Review of wish
Review of venmo
Trying to pay a contractor and I'm constantly being declined for no reason. I called customer support and the guy said there is no reason for the declines. Just keep trying and it SHOULD eventually go through. I asked him to transfer me to a technical support representative or a member of management. He said that wasn't possible and I would probably just need to find an alternate payment option. It seems as though their team members simply do not care, nor does the company as a whole...
Review of typeform
Review of tripadvisor
Been using Tripadvisor for 20 years.Over the last few years, the site has gone downhill, partly because most people are using google now, but a huge factor is that information is incorrect on Tripadvisor, and if you correct it using the "edit" option, they ALWAYS reject the edit!Information used to be correct OR edits were accepted so information was more correct for users, but in the last few years, something has changed as they now just reject most edits.Even if they have a dead link or incorrect link, and you give them a link that not only looks correct but even says "official page", they just ignore and reject it!Even if it is the same domain, but a different link as the company updated it, they still deny the edit.99.9% of all edits, especially URL edits, are rejected.I have been on the site 20 years and even with my 20 year old profile, who only gives correct info, they just reject every edit!They have even had unofficial sites and users personal sites as links, and when you give them a correct official link, they reject!They clearly aren't looking at the links you give.You can easily see if a site is correct or not, and if it isn't instantly obvious, 10 seconds of searching online will tell you!But they clearly aren't checking at all. They are just guessing and refusing most edits.So much information is wrong because they reject 99.9% of edits.It is so bad that their social media told me to just DM them and they would update it that way!They clearly see there is an issue so gave me that workaround, but I shouldn't have to use social media to get edits done, just because your team don't bother to check the information!This just means people use other sites because your information is wrong!Even Google let users edit information and they approve edits 99% of the time!Why is Tripadvisor so bad in this respect?I have used Tripadvisor so much and contributed so much over 20 years, but people are just moving to other sites as you just don't care about correct information.You need to either tell the people that accept or deny edits to READ and CHECK the information before rejecting or you could have it so the system automatically accepts if the person correcting the info has an account over x years or had so many approved edits.Staff need to do better.Denying 99.9% of edits such as URL's is not acceptable.They need to do some checks! Not guess!
Review of Spotify
Review of org
Apologies but this is going to be a bit long.Visited St Michael's Mount, Cornwall in May. Visit was part of a long coastal walk. Tide was out so able to walk across causeway to the Mount. On arrival, told we couldn't get in as we hadn't booked online. Dejected, walked back to Marazion. Checked NT website for St Michael's Mount and found there were places available for visiting at the time we were turned away. Booked tickets online and returned to the Mount where we were greeted by another member of staff who told us staff have a contingency for visitors turning up without tickets - if there are places available, they check you in then and there. Was asked if I wanted to speak to a 'manager' and was taken into an office and spoke to someone who didn't introduce herself or explain her role. I shared my annoyance at being turned away and said I would complain to HQ and share my experience online at which point I was asked to leave.I used NT's complaint procedure and got a reply saying my complaint had been directed to staff at St Michael's Mount. Guess what? Nothing from St Michael's Mount.It seems to me the National Trust has lost its way. My membership card boasts, 'for everyone, for ever' which seems hollow given my experience.
Review of jotform
We used jotform for almost a month, we were shock when we found this useful tool. There are lots of integration platforms can use, and automatically data visualization, those function really helped our work more fluent.Thank you JotForm.And here is some feedback, if user can indent CONDITIONAL LOGIC that might be a big hand, like Nested loop.
Review of avg
Review of google
I have had the Google pixel Pro 8 for a while now and all it does is crash and restart. This is probably the worst pixel phone that I have ever had. I've had the 4 XL and I've had the pro 6 and this Pro 8 is the worst by far fire beware!.
Review of google
I have had the Google pixel Pro 8 for a while now and all it does is crash and restart. This is probably the worst pixel phone that I have ever had. I've had the 4 XL and I've had the pro 6 and this Pro 8 is the worst by far fire beware!.
Review of google
I have had the Google pixel Pro 8 for a while now and all it does is crash and restart. This is probably the worst pixel phone that I have ever had. I've had the 4 XL and I've had the pro 6 and this Pro 8 is the worst by far fire beware!.
Review of google
I have had the Google pixel Pro 8 for a while now and all it does is crash and restart. This is probably the worst pixel phone that I have ever had. I've had the 4 XL and I've had the pro 6 and this Pro 8 is the worst by far fire beware!.
